We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 24 December 13
AUSTRALIAN NEWCASTLE PORT'S WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS UP 11.46% W-W
COALspot.com: In the week ended December 23, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 3.84 ...
Tuesday, 24 December 13
SGX HAS LAUNCHED FREIGHT FUTURES
COALspot.com: Singapore Exchange (SGX) has announced the launch of freight future yesterday.
According to SGX’s press release, SGX has laun ...
Monday, 23 December 13
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR AVERAGE Q1' 14 CLOSED AT $ 82.80
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 2.97 percept month on month as on Friday 20 December 2013. ...
Sunday, 22 December 13
Q1' 14 DELIVERY COAL SWAPS CLOSING HIGH COMPARED TO Q4' 14 DELIVERY CLOSING
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB) for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained $ 1.31 pmt month on month on Friday 20 December 2013 ...
Sunday, 22 December 13
QUIET FREIGHT MARKET DUE TO LONG HOLIDAYS
COALspot.com: The market was soft this week with all indices down. However towards second half of the week the futures on segments was firming up.
...
|
|
|
Showing 3941 to 3945 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Australian Coal Association
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The University of Queensland
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
