We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 20 December 13
US PRODUCED 2.71% MORE COAL WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Friday, 20 December 13
DRY BULK MARKET SLUMPS AHEAD OF HOLIDAY SEASON - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
As has been the case in recent years, the dry bulk market has been on a downward trend ahead of the Holiday Season for a large part of the world. Th ...
Thursday, 19 December 13
SHIPPING CONFIDENCE HITS THREE-YEAR HIGH - MOORE STEPHENS
Overall confidence levels in the shipping industry rose to their highest level for more than three years over the three-month period to November 201 ...
Wednesday, 18 December 13
SNP ACTIVITY IN CHINA SEEMS TO BE SLOWING DOWN - CHRISTOS TRAGEAS
Approaching the end of the year, SnP activity in China seems to be slowing down in comparison to the first half of this quarter, as most Chinese Shi ...
Wednesday, 18 December 13
DEMOLITION ACTIVITY SCALED BACK AS FREIGHT RATES RISE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
It's always been the case that each time we witness a spike in freight rates, demolition activity is decreasing, as owners are looking for more car ...
|
|
|
Showing 3946 to 3950 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- White Energy Company Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- The University of Queensland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
