We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 13 December 13
DRY BULK SHIPPING TO WITNESS HEALTHY DEMAND MOVING FORWARD - ICS
The Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers Greek Branch organised its 9th Annual Forum at Eugenides Foundation, on Wednesday, 11th of December, with a r ...
Friday, 13 December 13
US PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY 18.4 MILLION SHORT TONS OF COAL W/E 7 DECEMBER 2013
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.4 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 12 December 13
GREAT EXPECTATIONS SANCTIONED - EVA TZIMA
News that sanctions on Iranian oil exports could be lifted sometime in the following months have shaken the markets recently. One of the world&rsquo ...
Thursday, 12 December 13
DRY BULK MARKET RATES FOR CAPESIZES TO REMAIN VOLATILE SAYS BIMCO
The dry bulk market has reached multi year highs this week, as the BDI is standing at the 2,300-point mark. In its analysis of the market, BIMCO pre ...
Wednesday, 11 December 13
THE INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT IS CONSIDERING SETTING A REGULATION ON THE MINIMUM PURITY TO REGULATE UNPROCESSED ORE BAN
COALspot.com: Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Jero Wacik recently proposed to house those mining (mineral) companies that had shown a commitme ...
|
|
|
Showing 3956 to 3960 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- The University of Queensland
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
|
| |
| |
|
