We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 31 March 14
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR Q2 14 DELIVERY LOST 1.17% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries lost 1.17 percent month on month and closed at US$ 75.38 per m ...
Sunday, 30 March 14
FREIGHTS FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA IS EXPECTED TO BE SOFT NEXT WEEK - REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market dropped drastically and all sectors were affected severely.
The BDI was down by 14.13 pct and closed at 1, ...
Friday, 28 March 14
US PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY 18.9 MMST IN A WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
Friday, 28 March 14
CHINA'S ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES WILL NOT CURB GROWTH IN DOMESTIC STEEL PRODUCTION AND SEABORNE IRON ORE - WOOD MACKENZIE SAYS
Steel plants in China have been targeted as a major source of the toxic smog enveloping Beijing and Shanghai. Emergency measures have been impos ...
Thursday, 27 March 14
PANAMAX : SEEMS TO HEAD FURTHER DOWN; CAPESIZE : ANOTHER CHOPPY AND UNPREDICTABLE WEEK - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
A weaker sentiment for the smaller size as well, with reduced activity in the Atlantic where Owners have to face significantly lower ret ...
|
|
|
Showing 3776 to 3780 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
|
| |
| |
|
