We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 26 March 14
NEWBUILDING ORDERING ACTIVITY PICKS UP PACE ON IMPROVING DRY BULK MARKET CONDITIONS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The gradual improvement of the dry bulk market, as expected for some time now, is urging shipowners to increase their newbuilding ordering activ ...
Wednesday, 26 March 14
LARGE AMOUNT OF VESSELS CHARTERED TO HAUL IRON ORE CARGOES TO CHINESE BUYERS THIS WEEK - COMMODORE RESEARCH & CONSULTANCY
COALspot.com: Through the first three days of this week, 18 dry bulk vessels have been chartered to haul spot iron ore cargoes to Chinese buyers ...
Wednesday, 26 March 14
JOIN IN THE CLEAN COAL CASE STUDY WITH SINOPEC!
Produced by CDMC Events, The 13th Clean Coal Forum 2014 will be held on June 12,13, 2014 in Beijing, China. We are glad to invite Experts ...
Tuesday, 25 March 14
INDONESIAN SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL SWAP FOR Q2 DELIVERY CLOSED $ 57.40 PMT W/E 21 MARCH 2014
COALspot.com – Indonesia, the world’s largest exporter of the thermal coal's swaps for delivery April - June 2014 gained this pa ...
Tuesday, 25 March 14
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS JUMP 29.16% TO 2.79 MMT WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 24 March 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, total 2.79 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3781 to 3785 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Planning Commission, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PTC India Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The University of Queensland
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
