We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 24 March 14
SGX'S Q2'14 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSES SLIGHTLY HIGHER W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries lost 1.81 percent month on month and closed at US$ 74.82 per mt as o ...
Sunday, 23 March 14
THE COAL FREIGHT RATES SEEN SLIGHTLY FIRMING UP THIS WEEK - REDDY
COALspot.com: The freight market firmed up this week. BDI was up 8.26 pct week on week and index was closed at 1599 points. The Cape index was u ...
Saturday, 22 March 14
SHIP OWNERS INVEST $15 BILLION FOR NEWBUILDINGS AND SECONDHAND VESSELS DURING FEBRUARY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Ship owners have kept on their aggressive stance in the investment scene both for newbuildings, as well as for secondhand vessels globally durin ...
Friday, 21 March 14
DRY BULK MARKET STAYS ON RECOVERY MODE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has reached new year heighs, as a result of renewed Capesize demand. The Baltic Dry Index (BDI) ended yesterday's sessio ...
Friday, 21 March 14
US COAL PRODUCTION UP 1.5%; WEST MISSISSIPPI COAL PRODUCTION DOWN 1.85% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.0 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
|
|
|
Showing 3786 to 3790 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PTC India Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The University of Queensland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Australian Coal Association
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
