We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 07 April 14
WEEKLY SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLAIMS EDGE FALL; TREND NEGATIVE
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q4’ 2014 lost on month, day and on week according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports ...
Monday, 07 April 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS GAINED 2.09% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries gained 2.09 percent month on month and closed at US$ 75.68 per ...
Sunday, 06 April 14
THE FREIGHT MARKET KEEPS SLIDING
COALspot.com: The freight market continued to drop this week. The BDI (Baltic Dry Index) is a widely followed metric that reflects the overall r ...
Friday, 04 April 14
UNITED STATES COAL OUTPUT UP 5.4% IN PAST WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world's second largest coal producer, produced approximately 19.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal i ...
Thursday, 03 April 14
PANAMAX SECTOR IS WATCHING A SEVERE DROP IN RATES - FEARNLEYS
Handy
A further weaker sentiment for the Supras as well in both hemispheres this week with oversupply of tonnage being the major headline. Tra ...
|
|
|
Showing 3766 to 3770 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The University of Queensland
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
