We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 05 June 21
IT'S TIME FOR THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TO CHAMPION RENEWABLE ENERGY IN THE PHILIPPINES, NOT NUCLEAR OR FOSSIL GAS - IEEFA
Fossil gas and nuclear investments risk locking in costly, outdated infrastructure for the long-term
The United States has spent the ...
Friday, 04 June 21
NEW COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS IN INDIA WILL BE ECONOMICALLY UNVIABLE - IEEFA
Coal capacity additions face major stranded asset risk
Much of India’s 33 gigawatts (GW) of coal-fired power capacity currently under co ...
Thursday, 03 June 21
JUNE HBA IS HITTING ABOVE $100 AND SETTLED AT ITS HIGHEST SINCE OCTOBER 2020
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal price reference for June 2021 settles at US$ 100.33 per ton FOB vessel.
The Indonesia coal pr ...
Wednesday, 02 June 21
INDONESIA RV WAS DOWN TO LOW/MID $20,000S DAY FOR PANAMAX/KAMSARMAX WITH DELIVERY S CHINA - BANCHERO COSTA
Panamax
A softening week in the Pacific basin with rates under a downward pressure mainly caused by the oversupply of tonnage in the area, said ...
Wednesday, 02 June 21
EUROPEAN UNION'S IRON ORE IMPORTS - BANCHERO COSTA
The European Union (27) is currently the fourth largest importer of iron ore in the world, after China, Japan, and South Korea.
Euro ...
|
|
|
Showing 561 to 565 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
