We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 16 June 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
“While approaching the second half of the year and summer season is just around the corner, COVID vaccination programs are steadily moving fo ...
Monday, 14 June 21
'WISHFUL THINKING': WHY CHINA NEEDS AUSTRALIAN IRON ORE FOR 'MANY YEARS' TO COME - YAHOO FINANCE AU
A “wintry period”.
That’s what’s expected to happen to Australia’s economy “when” China st ...
Sunday, 13 June 21
COAL AND LNG’S SURGE IN ASIA PLAYS INTO RENEWABLE ENERGY HANDS - REUTERS
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) and thermal coal prices in Asia have been roaring ahead in recent months amid strong demand, but while welcome news for ...
Friday, 11 June 21
5 REASONS GLOBAL SHIPPING COSTS WILL CONTINUE TO RISE - ING
No short-term relief
Shipping costs have been growing strongly since the autumn of 2020, but the first months of this year have seen a new surg ...
Friday, 11 June 21
ASIA COAL PRICES SURGE, BUT CHINA-AUSTRALIA DISPUTE MEANS RALLY IS UNEVEN - REUTERS
Thermal coal prices across Asia have surged to multi-year highs amid strong demand and some supply constraints, but some types of the fuel have don ...
|
|
|
Showing 551 to 555 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The University of Queensland
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
