We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 27 May 21
KOMIPO INVITED BIDS FOR 1.56 MILLION TONS OF BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com: Korea Midland Power Co., Ltd (KOMIPO) has issued an international tender for total 1,560,000 MT of Bituminous Coal to be used a ...
Thursday, 27 May 21
CHINA POWER DEMAND EXCEEDS PRE-COVID-19 LEVELS; THERMAL OUTPUT STRONG - FITCH RATINGS
Rising Consumption: Total power consumption rose by 21.2% yoy to 1,921.9GWh in 1Q21 due to the fast recovery of China’s economy, after a drop ...
Thursday, 27 May 21
CHINA'S POWER DEMAND EXCEEDS PRE-PANDEMIC LEVELS; RENEWABLES TO DRIVE DEVELOPMENT - FITCH RATINGS
China's power consumption exceeded the pre-Covid-19 levels in 1Q21 due to the country's fast economic recovery, with strong output from the ...
Wednesday, 26 May 21
THE INDONESIA COAL PRICE REFERENCE FOR MAY 2021 SETTLES AT US$ 89.74 PER TON
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal price reference for May 2021 settles at US$ 89.74 per ton FOB vessel.
The Indonesia coal pric ...
Wednesday, 26 May 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Last year crude tankers’ newbuilding contracting activity was devastated by the economic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic and the cloud of un ...
|
|
|
Showing 571 to 575 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- VISA Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
