We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 30 June 21
BUMA SIGNED MINING AGREEMENT WITH ADARO
PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk. announced that its subsidiary, PT Bukit Makmur Mandiri Utama ("BUMA"), has entered into an agreement for the p ...
Wednesday, 30 June 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The strong freight performance since the beginning of year has continued for the dry bulk market with earnings being at the highest level in over a ...
Monday, 28 June 21
MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF INDONESIA THREATENS TO REVOKE 2,350 MINING BUSINESS PERMITS
The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources said that the revocation of mining business permits was in accordance with President Jokowi's inst ...
Sunday, 27 June 21
INDONESIA'S STATE-OWNED UTILITY PLN'S 2060 NET ZERO AMBITION NOT WITHOUT FLAWS AND GAPS - IEEFA
Indonesia on the right emissions reduction pathway but same old coal stories persist
Recent announcements by Indonesia’s state-owned uti ...
Saturday, 26 June 21
COAL PRICES HIT DECADE HIGH DESPITE EFFORTS TO WEAN THE WORLD OFF CARBON - WSJ
Rebounding electricity usage and scanty rainfall in China have added fuel to the rally
Coal prices have climbed to their highest lev ...
|
|
|
Showing 541 to 545 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The University of Queensland
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Coal Association
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
|
| |
| |
|
