We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 07 April 15
Q3 FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $ 55.96 PMT; DOWN 8.40% M-M
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 declined month over month and week on week.
The Q2 swap has declined U ...
Monday, 06 April 15
INDONESIA'S HBA FIXED AT US$ 64.48 PMT FOR APRIL DELIVERY; DOWN 4.84% M-M
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia revised down Indonesian coal benchmark prices to US$ 64.48 per MT in Apr ...
Monday, 06 April 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP DECLINED 12% MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 6.23 per MT (-12%) month over month and US$ 0.86 (-1.85%) week ...
Monday, 06 April 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FALL CONTINUES
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 5.96 (-10.37%) per MT month over month and US$ 0.98 (- ...
Sunday, 05 April 15
FREIGHT RATES UNDER PRESSURE WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: The Indices fell on all segments and the market seemed to soften this week.
The BDI was almost lost 1.34% week over week and clo ...
|
|
|
Showing 3086 to 3090 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Planning Commission, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Parliament of New Zealand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
|
| |
| |
|
