We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 14 April 15
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAPS FOR Q4 DELIVERY CRASHES THROUGH $44
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q2 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q2 swap was declined US$ 2.25 (4.77%) ...
Monday, 13 April 15
Q2 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $45.28 PMT; DECLINED 7.50% M-M
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 3.67 per MT (-7.50%) month over month and US$ 0.39 week on wee ...
Monday, 13 April 15
Q4 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED AT US$ 50.97
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 4.50 (-8.05%) per MT month over month and US$ 0.12 (-0 ...
Sunday, 12 April 15
INDONESIA TO INDIA FREIGHT RATE IS EXPECTED TO BE SOFT
COALspot.com: The freight market was steady, however the BDI was declined slightly week over week.
BDI dropped 1.36 pct and closed at 580 poin ...
Friday, 10 April 15
US COAL PRODUCTION FELL 4.7% W-O-W : EIA
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.4 million short ...
|
|
|
Showing 3076 to 3080 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
|
| |
| |
|
