We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 01 April 15
SUPRAMAX & HANDY: RATES HELD STEADY TOWARDS THE WEEKEND
“Despite the fact that the Dry Bulk market closed off on the green last week, sentiment didn't improve by any means, not only because of ...
Wednesday, 01 April 15
WEEKLY SHIPPING MARKET UPDATE - INTERMODAL
There is no doubt that we are still witnessing a very challenging and at the same time very uncertain market, both with respect to dry chartering a ...
Wednesday, 01 April 15
Q4' 15 INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $45.15 W/E 27 MARCH 2015
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 drops month on month and week over week.
The Q2 swap declined US$ 1.54 (3.24%) mo ...
Tuesday, 31 March 15
RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS GAIN WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 declined month over month but increased week on week.
The Q2 swap has ...
Monday, 30 March 15
WORST IS OVER FOR THE DRY BULK MARKET, BUT THE PAIN WILL REMAIN FOR YEARS TO COME, SAYS BIMCO CHIEF ANALYST - HELLENIC SHIPPING
The current demise of the dry bulk market isn’t one to go away anytime soon. That doesn’t mean that it can’t improve, with all sh ...
|
|
|
Showing 3096 to 3100 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Planning Commission, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The University of Queensland
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
|
| |
| |
|
