We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 19 April 15
THE OCEAN FREIGHT MARKET SHOWED STEADY THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market was fairly steady this week. The BDI was up 2.93% to 597 points week over week. The cape index was also increased ...
Friday, 17 April 15
IHS ENERGY EUROPEAN COAL OUTLOOK CONFERENCE
Attend the IHS Energy European Coal Outlook Conference 19-20 May in Nice, France and learn about timely concerns in today’s coal industry.
...
Friday, 17 April 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. UP THIS PAST WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 18.0 million short ...
Thursday, 16 April 15
NEW COMMODITY SUPERHIGHWAY WILL EMERGE IN CHINA, ALTERING ENERGY TRADE FLOWS - WOOD MACKENZIE
Wood Mackenzie says that China’s Go West strategy – encouraging coastal to inland flow of capital and people - will result in the forma ...
Thursday, 16 April 15
SHIPPING DEMAND TO SUFFER AS CHINESE SLOWDOWN CONFIRMED SAYS BIMCO'S CHIEF SHIPPING ANALYST - BIMCO
The Chinese economy grew by 7.0% y-o-y in the first quarter of 2015, according to National Bureau of Statistics in China. This is the weakest overa ...
|
|
|
Showing 3066 to 3070 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- White Energy Company Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
