We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 21 April 15
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP: GAINED W-O-W; DECLINED M-O-M
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q2 2015 gained week over week and declined month on month.
The Q2 swap was declined US$ 1.75 ( ...
Tuesday, 21 April 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP MOVE UP SLIGHTLY
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q2' 2015 increased slightly month over month.
The Q2 swap has increased US$ 0.2 ...
Monday, 20 April 15
BUKIT ASAM TAKES OVER STAKE IN JV FROM RAJAWALI - JP
State-owned coal miner PT Bukit Asam (PTBA) announced Friday that it had taken over almost the entire stake in a joint venture (JV) that it created ...
Monday, 20 April 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP GAINED WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 3.54 per MT (-7.21%) month over month and gained US$ 0.30 week ...
Monday, 20 April 15
Q4' 2015 API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED US$ 50.28 PMT
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 4.03 (-7.28%) per MT month over month and US$ 0.05 (-0 ...
|
|
|
Showing 3061 to 3065 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
