We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 22 May 15
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION STAYS FLAT AT 16 MMST
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 16.0 million short ...
Thursday, 21 May 15
PORT OF NEWCASTLE ACHIEVED ITS BEST EVER TOTAL COAL EXPORT TURNOVER OF 159 MILLION TONS IN 2014
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port, has shipped $900 million ...
Thursday, 21 May 15
ATLANTIC PANAMAX MARKET STARTED TO IMPROVE SLOWLY - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market closed off the week on the green last week, purely on the back of improved Capesize performance, while the rest o ...
Wednesday, 20 May 15
LOWER PRICES SEEN IN NEWBUILDING MARKET ON LOW DEMAND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Cash-rich ship owners, or at least, owners with substantial access to financing will be among the prime candidates, who will reap the benefits of t ...
Wednesday, 20 May 15
TANKER MARKET INSIGHT - JOHN N. COTZIAS
Since Early October 2014 the tanker market has been experiencing a very positive momentum and has continued its strong performance so far in 2015. ...
|
|
|
Showing 3011 to 3015 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The University of Queensland
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- MS Steel International - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
