We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 08 June 15
SHIPPING FLEET GROWTH HAS STARTED TO SLOW DOWN, AS NEWBUILDINGS AMOUNT TO JUST 329 SHIPS OF ALL TYPES SINCE THE START OF 2015 - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Challenging market conditions have led to the inevitable reconsideration of ship owners’ priorities. Uncertainty has been the norm over the p ...
Monday, 08 June 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS ADVANCED M-O-M AND W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery increased US$ 0.65 per MT (1.44%) month over month to US$ 45.65 per mt. The ...
Monday, 08 June 15
Q3'15 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP ADVANCED 3.51% TO $52.48 PMT THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 1.78 (3.51%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap is a ...
Sunday, 07 June 15
PANAMAX INDEX ROSE OVER 13% THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market was up on all segments this past week. The BDI was advanced 3.56% and closed at 610 points. The Cape Index was cli ...
Friday, 05 June 15
U.S PRODUCED 15.1 MMST OF COAL THIS PAST WEEK; LESS 20.7% COMPARED TO SAME PERIOD IN 2014
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totalled an estimated 15.1 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2986 to 2990 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parliament of New Zealand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
