We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 15 June 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP: ROSE M-O-M; DECLINED W-O-W
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 1.43 (2.82%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap is a ...
Sunday, 14 June 15
THE FREIGHT MARKET FINISHED THE WEEK UP COMPARED TO LAST WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market finished the week up compared to last week. All the segments except for Cape index were up. Cape segment was ...
Friday, 12 June 15
EXPECTATIONS IN REGARDS TO THE SUMMER SEASON VARY ACROSS THE MARKET - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market closed off last slightly up last week, with the BDI re-gaining the 600 points level, while the driving force behind the increas ...
Friday, 12 June 15
U.S. PRODUCED 15.1 MMST OF COAL THIS PAST WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.1 million short ...
Thursday, 11 June 15
IS COAL INDUSTRY GOING TO HIT A BRICK WALL?
COALspot.com - The Director General of Mineral and Coal of Indonesia revised down Indonesian coal benchmark price once again to US$ 59.59 per MT fo ...
|
|
|
Showing 2976 to 2980 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PTC India Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
|
| |
| |
|
