We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 01 June 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP; Q1'16 CLOSED LOWER COMPARED TO Q3'15
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery gained US$ 0.36 per MT (0.80%) month over month. The swap was closed at US$ ...
Monday, 01 June 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP: GAINED W-W, M-M; Q1'16 CLOSED HIGHER THAN Q3'15
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery up US$ 1.15 (2.26%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap is a f ...
Sunday, 31 May 15
CAPE AND PANAMAX SEGMENTS SLIDE CONTINUES
COALspot.com: The BDI was up about 0.5 pct week on week and closed at 589 points while the cape index was fell 0.73 pct and closed at 810 po ...
Friday, 29 May 15
DRY BULK MARKET IS THE VICTIM OF A SHIFT IN DEMAND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The fall in dry bulk freight rates is attributed, in large part, to the substantial decrease of China’s thermal coal imports, a major commodi ...
Friday, 29 May 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. ALMOST FLAT THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 16.1 million short ...
|
|
|
Showing 2996 to 3000 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- White Energy Company Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
|
| |
| |
|
