We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 06 July 15
KOREA MIDLAND POWER COMPANY LIMITED ISSUED A TENDER FOR 250K MT BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender for 250K Metric Tons (MT) of 5300 kcal/kg NAR coal ...
Monday, 06 July 15
COAL TRADING & RISK MANAGEMENT TRAINING COURSE
Are you ready to invest in yourself and take your trading and risk management strategy to the next level? The Coal Trading & Risk Management Tr ...
Monday, 06 July 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP; DECLINED D-O-D,W-O-W AND M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.53 (1.01%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap ...
Sunday, 05 July 15
THE BALTIC DRY INDEX WAS DOWN 18%; PANAMAX UP 9%
COALspot.com: The freight market was soft during this week. However indices closed slightly firmer end of the week on 3rd July.
The BDI was do ...
Friday, 03 July 15
U.S DELIVERS WEAK FIRST HALF COAL PRODUCTION; 8.8% LOWER Y-O-Y
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.5 million short ...
|
|
|
Showing 2941 to 2945 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Planning Commission, India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
