We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 12 July 15
SHIPYARD NOT LIABLE FOR ENGINE ROOM FIRE CAUSED BY OIL LEAKAGE - BIRCH WINDAHL
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A Danish vessel owner requested a Danish shipyard to undertake repairs and maintenance works on its vessel. An agreement ...
Saturday, 11 July 15
MAJOR IRANIAN GAS EXPORTS WILL TAKE AT LEAST FIVE YEARS - FITCH
Iran has the long-term potential to become one of the world's top gas producers, thanks to its 34 trillion cubic meters (tcm) of natural gas re ...
Friday, 10 July 15
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS POSITIVE MOMENTUM - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has kept its positive momentum over the course of the past few days, thanks to Panamax gains. During yesterday’s session ...
Friday, 10 July 15
U.S PRODUCED APPROXIMATELY TOTALED AN ESTIMATED 14.1 MMST WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 14.1 million short ...
Thursday, 09 July 15
CPP MARKET : POSITIVE IN THE SHORT TERM - GEORGE VASTARDIS
Despite the traditionally quieter summer period, the clean tanker market has so far experienced healthy activity especially East of Suez. Increased ...
|
|
|
Showing 2931 to 2935 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
