We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 09 July 15
LACK OF FRESH BUSINESS IN THE PACIFIC LEFT CAPESIZE RATES MOVING SIDEWAYS - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: Intermodal ship broker says in its weekly report that, a different picture from what we saw the previous week was painted during the ...
Wednesday, 08 July 15
RIO TINTO'S MODERNISED KITIMAT SMELTER BEGINS PRODUCTION; KITIMAT BECOMING ONE OF THE LOWEST COST SMELTERS IN THE WORLD
COALspot.com: Rio Tinto is preparing its first shipments of metal from its world-class Kitimat aluminium smelter in Canada following an extensive m ...
Wednesday, 08 July 15
Q3'15 INDONESIA COAL SWAP DECLINED 3.14% MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q3 2015 declined month on month and week over week, this past week.
The Q3 swap was declined $ ...
Tuesday, 07 July 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS DECLINED WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q3' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The Q3 swap was down US$ ...
Tuesday, 07 July 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP ADVANCED MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery up $ 0.28 per MT (-0.61%) month over month to US$ 45.85 per mt. The swap wa ...
|
|
|
Showing 2936 to 2940 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The University of Queensland
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
