We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 17 August 15
INDONESIAN THERMAL COAL REFERENCE PRICE HITS RECORD LOW AGAIN!
COALspot.com - The Director General of Mineral and Coal of Indonesia revised down Indonesian coal benchmark price once again to US$ 59.14 per MT fo ...
Monday, 17 August 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS CONTINUE TO HEAD SOUTH
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery declined just US cents 40 (1.05%) per MT month over month.
A commodi ...
Sunday, 16 August 15
INDONESIA TO INDIA FREIGHT RATES ARE EXPECTED TO STEADY NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI softened 12.08 per cent to 1055 points this week due to weakening of cape index which was fell 25 per cent week over week to ...
Friday, 14 August 15
FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP SHOWING NO MOVEMENT THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and week over week, this past week.
The 4Q swap was declined $ ...
Friday, 14 August 15
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION UP 2.9 PER CENT THIS WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 18.2 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2866 to 2870 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- White Energy Company Limited
|
| |
| |
|
