We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 17 August 15
INDONESIAN THERMAL COAL REFERENCE PRICE HITS RECORD LOW AGAIN!
COALspot.com - The Director General of Mineral and Coal of Indonesia revised down Indonesian coal benchmark price once again to US$ 59.14 per MT fo ...
Monday, 17 August 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS CONTINUE TO HEAD SOUTH
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery declined just US cents 40 (1.05%) per MT month over month.
A commodi ...
Sunday, 16 August 15
INDONESIA TO INDIA FREIGHT RATES ARE EXPECTED TO STEADY NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI softened 12.08 per cent to 1055 points this week due to weakening of cape index which was fell 25 per cent week over week to ...
Friday, 14 August 15
FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP SHOWING NO MOVEMENT THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and week over week, this past week.
The 4Q swap was declined $ ...
Friday, 14 August 15
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION UP 2.9 PER CENT THIS WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 18.2 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2866 to 2870 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
