We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 05 October 15
Q1 & Q2 2016 DELIVERY SWAPS DECLINED M-M AND W-W THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q4’ 2015 delivery decreased $0.36 per ton (0.85%) month over month to US$ 42.12 per ton. The ...
Monday, 05 October 15
Q1' 16 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED US$ 48.05 PER TON
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down US$ 0.47 (0.96 %) per ton month over month.
A commodity swap is ...
Monday, 05 October 15
SMALL DECLINE IN 2014 SHIP OPERATING COSTS - MOORE STEPHENS
Total annual operating costs in the shipping industry fell by an average of 0.8% in 2014. This compares with the 0.3% average fall in costs recorde ...
Sunday, 04 October 15
THE INDO-INDIA FREIGHT MARKET REMAINS UNDER PRESSURE
COALspot.com: The BDI closed on Friday (2 Oct 2015) at 889 points, down by 54 points compared to previous Friday's closing ( 24 Sept 2015) of 9 ...
Friday, 02 October 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES DECREASED THIS WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.5 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2786 to 2790 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- White Energy Company Limited
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PTC India Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
|
| |
| |
|
