We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 12 October 15
DRY BULK SHIPPING: MARKETS ARE SLOWLY IMPROVING FROM A VERY LOW LEVEL AS THE DEMAND SIDE FALTERS - HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market is in the midst of a shift in demand patterns, which coupled with a tonnage supply overhang, has been facing headwinds over the ...
Monday, 12 October 15
BDI WEIGHED DOWN BY CAPE
COALspot.com: The BDI (Baltic Dry Index) has come back down again this week. The BDI is a benchmark index used to assess the overall cost of moving ...
Sunday, 11 October 15
TANKER SHIPPING: MORE OPTIMISM IN SIGHT FOR TANKERS IN THE WINTER SEASON - BIMCO
Demand:
2015 has been the year of the tanker. The fundamental improvements with slow supply-side growth for some years coupled with low oil pri ...
Friday, 09 October 15
US WEEKLY COAL OUTPUT UP 1.2 PERCENT TO 17.7 MMST
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.7 million shor ...
Thursday, 08 October 15
CAPESIZE: MOST PEOPLE AGREE A SPIKE IN RATES WILL HAPPEN; WHEN, HOW LONG AND HOW SUBSTANTIAL? - FEARNLEYS
Cape
Depressives start of the fourth quarter, with c3 approaching USD 12 pmt and c5 presently in the mind 5's. According to Fearnleys ship br ...
|
|
|
Showing 2776 to 2780 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Minerals Council of Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- The University of Queensland
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PTC India Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
