We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 01 October 15
SOUTH KOREA'S KOMIPO SEEKS SPOT BITUMINOUS COAL SUPPLIES
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender for 265,000 Metric Tons (MT) of minimum 4,600 kcal ...
Wednesday, 30 September 15
Q1'16 FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FALLS $1.25 A TON AS SLIDE CONTINUES
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q4 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q4 swap declined $ 0.72 (-1.78%) per t ...
Wednesday, 30 September 15
NEW BUILDING MARKET INSIGHT
COALspot.com: This year has been, beyond any doubt, a rather strenuous one for the newbuilding market. Ordering activity with regards to Dry Bulker ...
Tuesday, 29 September 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS ARE SLIDING
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q4' 2015 declined week over week and month over month.
The Q4 swap was down US$ ...
Monday, 28 September 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS UP $2.15 IN ONE MONTH
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q4’ 2015 delivery increased $2.10 per ton (5.15%) month over month to US$ 42.93 per ton. The ...
|
|
|
Showing 2791 to 2795 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
