We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 18 October 15
THE BDI AND OTHER INDICES CLOSED OFF ON NEGATIVE NOTE THIS FRIDAY
COALspot.com: The BDI closed off on negative note this Friday compared to previous Friday's closing.
The BDI closed this Friday (16 Octobe ...
Friday, 16 October 15
MAJOR REVISION OF NYPE TIME CHAPTER PARTY - BIMCO
Major revision of NYPE time charter party promises to be both balanced and comprehensive
BIMCO has today jointly issued the first revision of ...
Friday, 16 October 15
FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP FOR Q4'15 DELIVERY FLAT WEEK OVER WEEK; DOWN 5.5 PER CENT M-M
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q4 2015 declined month on month and flat week over week.
The Q4 swap declined $ 2.23 (-5.51%) ...
Friday, 16 October 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE UNITED STATES DECREASED THIS WEEK; DOWN 11.3 PER CENT Y-Y, DOWN 3.5 PERCENT W-W
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.1 million shor ...
Friday, 16 October 15
INDONESIA REJOINING OPEC DESPITE BEING A NET IMPORTER OF PETROLEUM - EIA
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) notified Indonesia that it plans to accept the country's request to reactivate its ...
|
|
|
Showing 2766 to 2770 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Planning Commission, India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
|
| |
| |
|
