We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 21 October 15
RUSSIA'S CARBO ONE COAL SALES TO HIT 50 MLN T/YR - JACQUELINE HOLMES
COALspot.com: Russia's Carbo One has become one of the world's leading physical coal traders with an annual volume approaching 50 million t ...
Wednesday, 21 October 15
MARKET INSIGHT - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
In today’s dry bulk market, both freight rates and asset prices are creating mixed feelings to seasoned ship owners, who tend to instinctivel ...
Wednesday, 21 October 15
INDONESIAN COAL MINER BUKIT ASAM POSTS POSITIVE PERFORMANCE DURING FIRST THREE QUARTERS OF 2015
COALspot.com: Indonesian publicly listed and state controlled coal miner PT. Bukit Asam has announced that, the company’s coal sales up 8 per ...
Wednesday, 21 October 15
LOWER DEMAND HIT Q1' 16 INDONESIA COAL SWAPS
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q4 2015 declined month on month and week over week.
The Q4 swap declined $ 1.88 (-4.71%) per t ...
Tuesday, 20 October 15
SHIPBROKER SEES CAPESIZE RATES EASILY REACHING $25,000/DAY BY YEAR-END : NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The future course of the dry bulk market has been troubling market participants for quite some time now, as the “elusive” freight rate ...
|
|
|
Showing 2756 to 2760 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
|
| |
| |
|
