We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 26 October 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS CLOSE DOWN 4.3% AS DEMAND CONCERNS WEIGH
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for 4Q’ 2015 delivery down just US$ 1.48 (3.02 %) per ton month over month.
A commodity sw ...
Sunday, 25 October 15
ANOTHER DISAPPOINTING WEEK FOR PANAMAX; INDEX FELL 5.4 PERCENT W-W
COALspot.com: The BDI was slightly up by 2.65 pct closing at 774 points mainly because of Cape index which was up by 10.85 pct closing at 1461 poin ...
Sunday, 25 October 15
DRY BULK SHIP OWNERS ARE LOOKING TO CHINA'S POLICIES FOR CUES ON FUTURE MARKET DEMAND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
China’s hard or softer landing is a thing which has troubled dry bulk shipping for a couple of years now, as owners have been hit by the coun ...
Friday, 23 October 15
WILL INDIAN DOMESTIC COAL PRICES BE ABLE TO COMPETE IMPORTED COAL PRICES IF THE CURRENT TREND CONTINUES?
COALspot.com: The Most of the Indian end-users are waiting for last minute purchase to enjoy every drop in price. Coal procurement managers are als ...
Friday, 23 October 15
COAL PRODUCTION IN THE U.S. FOR THE WEEK ENDING OCTOBER 17 DECLINED FOR THE SECOND STRAIGHT WEEK
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 16.6 million shor ...
|
|
|
Showing 2751 to 2755 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The University of Queensland
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
