We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 22 November 11
ABM INVESTAMA SETS IPO AT RP 3,750
Insider Stories reported that, Integrated energy company PT ABM Investama Tbk has determined the IPO price at Rp3,750 (approximately US$ 0.415) per ...
Tuesday, 22 November 11
A SURPRISINGLY STRONG WEEK FOR THE CAPES - BRS
Positive gains for most of the segments this week, the exception being the Handysizes. Overall the BDI ended the week at 1,895 points (+3.3% week-on ...
Tuesday, 22 November 11
APPETITE FOR DRY BULK VESSELS SLOWS DOWN AT THE START OF THE WEEK - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market was down at the beginning of the week, as demand for Capesize vessels was particularly low. The industry’s benchmark, the ...
Monday, 21 November 11
CAPESIZES DRIVE MARKET LOWER, ANALYSTS DIVIDED ON DRY BULK OUTLOOK IN THE LONG RUN - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market ended the week on a sour note, with the industry’s benchmark heading downwards to 1,895 points, which represented a slight ...
Sunday, 20 November 11
THE FREIGHT MARKETS EXPECTED TO BE FIRM NEXT WEEK - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The market continued to move up with all sectors gaining except for handy size.
The BDI was up by 3.26 pct and closed at 1895 poin ...
|
|
|
Showing 4966 to 4970 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The University of Queensland
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
