We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 18 November 11
MMTC SEEKS 1.365 MMT OF IMPORTED COAL
COALspot.com - India's MMTC, the largest trading company of India and a major trading company of Asia, has issued a term supply tender for 1.365Mt ...
Friday, 18 November 11
KPC, ARUTMIN OUTPUT REACHED 47.1 MIO TONS - INSIDER STORIES
PT Kaltim Prima Coal (KPC) and PT Arutmin Indonesia, reported 47.1 million tons of coal production in 9M 2011, according to Indiser Stories.
Insi ...
Friday, 18 November 11
THE ATLANTIC SUPRAMAX MARKET EXPERIENCED A STEADY AND FIRM TENDENCY
Handy
The Atlantic Supramax market experienced a steady and firm tendency this week. Especially the North Atlantic and Mediterranean position ...
Friday, 18 November 11
BERAU COAL 9M PROFIT SOARS 194.46% - INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, PT Berau Coal Energy Tbk (BRAU), which is 84.7% owned by Bumi Plc, reported a 194.46% jump in net profit by end of Se ...
Thursday, 17 November 11
DRY BULK MARKET INCHES FORWARD AND INTO HIGHER GROUND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market edged higher yesterday, on the back of stronger demand for Capesize vessels and general improvement of sentiment on most of the ...
|
|
|
Showing 4971 to 4975 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Planning Commission, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
