We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 28 November 11
CITING CONTRACTS, MINING FIRMS ARE NOT PAYING ROYALTIES UNDER LAW - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, when the 2009 Law on Minerals and Coal was endorsed, hopes that Indonesia could maximize its revenue from the minera ...
Monday, 28 November 11
NEW ENVIRONMENTAL MARINE REGULATIONS TO IMPACT SHIPPING IN 2012 - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
August of next year will see some major changes for marine navigation. It’s when the North American ECA will come into force, introducing a 1% ...
Sunday, 27 November 11
INDIA'S KPCL TO IMPORT 50 MMT OF COAL FOR 10 YEARS
COALspot.com - Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (KPCL) will buy 5 million metric tonnes of coal annually for 10 years starting from 2015.
In a ...
Saturday, 26 November 11
INDIAN PORTS ARE BECOME COAL STOCKPILES..!!
COALspot.com - The Indian coal stocks and power tariff situation is the hot topic among the world coal producers as well as Indian coal importers.&n ...
Saturday, 26 November 11
THE FREIGHT MARKETS EXPECTED TO BE STEADY NEXT WEEK - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The market were down probably with the sentiments of global financial markets and all segments were down.
The BDI was up down by 4 ...
|
|
|
Showing 4956 to 4960 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
|
| |
| |
|
