We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 05 December 11
SGX LAUNCHED IHS MCCLOSKEY/XINHUA INFOLINK OTC CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL CONTRACT TODAY
COALspot.com - In order to meet the demand of the coal industry for an effective coal hedging tool with counterparty credit risk mitigation facility ...
Monday, 05 December 11
DRY BULK RATES LOOKING TO EXTEND GAINS THIS WEEK - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Capesize dry bulk carrier owners have had a great week, with rates rising for six straight sessions (including the end of the week before that). As ...
Sunday, 04 December 11
SUPRAMAX TRIPS VIA INDONESIA WERE REPORTED AROUND $ 7500 - 8000 PD
COALspot.com - The BDI and Cape index recovered this week. The BDI was up by 3.26 pct and Cape index saw a big jump and closed at 3409 points (up by ...
Saturday, 03 December 11
BORNEO TO SPEND US$600 MIO CAPEX - INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, Coking coal miner PT Borneo Lumbung Energi & Metal Tbk (BORN) plans to spend US$600 million capital expenditure ( ...
Friday, 02 December 11
DRY BULK CARRIERS BACK IN THE SPOTLIGHT AS MARKET SPEEDS UP - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
With the tanker and container markets suffering dearly, it seems that the tide has once again turned in favor of the dry bulk carriers, despite over ...
|
|
|
Showing 4946 to 4950 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- The University of Queensland
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- White Energy Company Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
|
| |
| |
|
