We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 27 December 11
MINERS MAKE CASE FOR RESUMING CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, problems with the renegotiation of mining contracts in the country are far from over, as agreements on several cruci ...
Tuesday, 27 December 11
COAL SHIPMENT OF TIANJIN PORT REACHED 6.72 MLN TONNES IN NOVEMBER - STEEL HOME / HELLENIC SHIPPING
Tianjin port shipped 6.72 million tonnes of coal in November, decreasing 600,000 tonnes versus 7.32 million tonnes in October, while up 21.09% or 1. ...
Tuesday, 27 December 11
NEW CLAUSE PUBLISHED FOR SLOW STEAMING - BIMCO
Many owners and operators faced with high bunker prices are considering implementing slow steaming regimes to save fuel and to assist with capacity ...
Monday, 26 December 11
NEW EXPORT TAX PLAN GREETED WITH PRAISE AND CRITICISM - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post, one of the Indonesia's leading english news paper reported that, both praise and criticism showered the government’s plan t ...
Sunday, 25 December 11
THERMAL COAL PRICES GAINED UP TO 4.32 PERCENT
COALspot.com - globalCOAL index gained 4.32 percent to US$106.36 per ton in RBCT, benchmark for South Asia and West Europe markets, for the week end ...
|
|
|
Showing 4911 to 4915 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
|
| |
| |
|
