We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 01 January 12
IS INDIA FOLLOWING INDONESIA TO STANDARDIZE COAL PRICES TO GET MAXIMUM BENEFITS?
COALspot.com - Coal India limited, an Indian state owned and world largest coal producer has introduced gross calorific value (GCV) based pricing me ...
Saturday, 31 December 11
GLOBALCOAL NEWC INDEX SURGED 2.32 PERCENT
COALspot.com - globalCOAL index in Newcastle Port, benchmark for Asian market, ended substantially higher, surged 2.32 percent to US$115.47 per ...
Saturday, 31 December 11
BORNEO LUMBUNG TO BUY BUMI STAKE, SWAP CEO - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe, one of the leading english news paper in Indonesia reported yesterday, shareholders of Indonesian coking coal miner Borneo Lumbun ...
Friday, 30 December 11
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD ISSUE PERMITS - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, business associations from both the palm oil and mining sectors have suggested that the central government should re ...
Thursday, 29 December 11
NEW VESSELS DELIVERED ARE FLOODING THE OCEANS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
As expected 2011 has been the year that newbuilding deliveries peaked and kept "flooding" the market, thus supressing freight rates and er ...
|
|
|
Showing 4906 to 4910 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Australian Coal Association
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
|
| |
| |
|
