We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 14 March 12
GLOBAL THERMAL TRADE FLOW CHANGES WILL ENSURE SECURITY OF THERMAL COAL SUPPLY, ALBEIT AT A HIGH PRICE - WOOD MACKENZIE
Wood Mackenzie Says Global Thermal Trade Flow Changes Will Ensure Security of Thermal Coal Supply, Albeit At a High Price Seaborne thermal demand by ...
Wednesday, 14 March 12
COKAL TAKES ANOTHER STEP IN DEVELOPING INFRASTRUCTURE TO FACILITATE METALLURGICAL COAL PRODUCTION
Global coal group, Cokal Limited (ASX-CKA), has signed Memorandums of Understanding (MoU’s) to develop two river ports and two small scale coa ...
Tuesday, 13 March 12
CLARIFICATION OF GR 24 OF 2012 REQUIRING DIVESTMENT OF FOREIGN OWNERSHIP OVER TIME
ASX Announcement
Global metallurgical coal group, Cokal Limited (ASX-CKA), is responding to the recent announcement of the Indonesian Ministry of ...
Tuesday, 13 March 12
EUROPEAN COAL CONTANGO: FURTHER STEEPNESS REQUIRED TO MAKE LARGE SCALE PHYSICAL TIME SPREAD ARBITRAGE MORE ATTRACTIVE - MISWIN MAHESH, BARCLAYS CAPITAL
COALspot.com - "With the contango between the Y+1 and M+1 ARA delivered contract now averaging above the $14/t level, there is an increasing in ...
Monday, 12 March 12
DELTA DUNIA 1M OVERBURDEN DROPS 3.1% - INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, Indonesia's second largest coal mining contractor PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk (DOID) reported a 25 million bank ...
|
|
|
Showing 4806 to 4810 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Australian Coal Association
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The University of Queensland
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- London Commodity Brokers - England
|
| |
| |
|
