We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 22 March 12
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS SURGING, CAPESIZES FALLING - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
In what seems to be an establishing pattern, the dry bulk market has kept its upward momentum, edging closer to the 900 point-mark, but the larger s ...
Wednesday, 21 March 12
BUMA HAS PRODUCED 2.3 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN FEBRUARY 2012
COALspot.com - PT. Delta Dunia Makmur's overburden removal in February 2012 has reached totaled 23.8 million bcm (+2.4% YoY) while coal production ...
Tuesday, 20 March 12
SMALLER DRY BULK VESSELS STILL LEADING DRY BULK MARKET TO HIGHER GROUND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has been growing during the past couple of weeks, but contrary to the usual practice, it’s not the larger Capesizes which ...
Monday, 19 March 12
WEEKLY DRY MARKET OVERVIEW: SMALLER VESSELS LEAD RATES HIGHER - MARIA BERTZELETOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The upward trend of the Baltic Dry Index persists strong from the end of February, spurred from the supramax market that offsets the weakness in the ...
Sunday, 18 March 12
BUKIT ASAM'S NET PROFIT IN 2011 ROSE 54% TO US$ 339.56 MILLION
COALspot.com - Company revenue for the period January - December 2011 amounting to Rp 10.6 trillion (approximately US$ 1,164,835,164.84) recorded an ...
|
|
|
Showing 4796 to 4800 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Planning Commission, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Australian Coal Association
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
|
| |
| |
|
