We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 12 March 12
DRY BULK RATES WILL REMAIN LOW IN 2012 SAYS DANISH SHIP FINANCE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
In its annual shipping survey Danish Ship Finance said that the current outlook for the Dry Bulk market seems unlikely to foster higher rates in any ...
Monday, 12 March 12
WEEKLY DRY MARKET OVERVIEW - MARIA BERTZELETOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The first days of March appear to be more encouraging for dry bulk operators, but the outlook is still gloomy for the rest of year with earnings for ...
Sunday, 11 March 12
FREIGHT RATES FOR INDONESIA TO INDIA WILL CONTINUE TO REMAIN FIRM- VISTAAR
COALspot.com - This week saw another upward trend with all indices up except for the Cape index.
The BDI was up by 6.87 pct closing at 824 points ...
Friday, 09 March 12
MINING IN INDONESIA: RESTRICTION ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT - SUNIL K KUMBHAT
COALspot.com - Recently Govt has passed regulation instructing foreign mining companies to reduce their ownership stake.
The regulation known as ...
Friday, 09 March 12
SHIP OWNERS LOOKING TO CHINA FOR REVIVAL, WHILE THEY KEEP SELLING OLD SHIPS FOR SCRAP - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
With China’s economic policy plan for the future on every ship owner’s mind, at least those involved in the dry bulk industry, the lates ...
|
|
|
Showing 4811 to 4815 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PTC India Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Electricity Authority - India
|
| |
| |
|
