We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 29 March 12
DRY BULK EDGED FURTHER UP, ON HEALTHY DEMAND FOR MOST SHIP TYPES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
With capesize vessels finally reappearing in demand, the dry bulk market had an easier task of rising yesterday, as the BDI (Baltic Dry Index) reach ...
Thursday, 29 March 12
ADARO FY11 NET INCOME JUMPS 124% - INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, PT Adaro Energy Tbk (ADRO) today announced a 124% jump in net income to US$552 million last year or US$0.017 a share. ...
Wednesday, 28 March 12
CUESTA HAS RECEIVED APPLICATIONS AND FIRM BIDS IN EXCESS OF $9 MILLION FOR THE COMPANYS IPO
COALspot.com - The Directors of Cuesta Coal Limited (ASX:CQC) have announced that today it has received applications and firm bids in excess of $9 m ...
Wednesday, 28 March 12
ORPHEUS ENERGY TO COMMENCE JORC DRILLING AT ADK PROJECT
COALspot.com - Indonesian coal explorer and producer, Orpheus Energy (ASX:OEG), have today announced that the company is about to commence a drillin ...
Tuesday, 27 March 12
DRY BULK MARKET KEEP RISING FOLLOWING THE SAME TREND OF LAST WEEK - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market kept its upward momentum this week, on the same reasons of those last week. That is, the smaller ship types are still on the ris ...
|
|
|
Showing 4786 to 4790 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The University of Queensland
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
|
| |
| |
|
