We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 05 April 12
COAL EXPORT TAX: MATTER OF CONCERN FOR INDIA - SUNIL K KUMBHAT
COALspot.com - Since the issuance of Indonesian Mining law in 2009, miners have increased their activities in exploring , ex ...
Thursday, 05 April 12
AKR COAL FIRST EXPORT SHIPMENT OF COAL SEABORNE
PT Anugrah Karya Raya (AKR Coal) subsidiary of PT AKR Corporindo Tbk., Indonesia’s leading integrated supply chain solutions provider and larg ...
Thursday, 05 April 12
DRY BULK MARKET STALLS AS TREND IS REVERSED - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has halted its month-long rally, with the BDI (Baltic Dry Index) retreating yesterday for a second consecutive session. Industry ...
Wednesday, 04 April 12
OIL MAY JUMP TO $150PB IF IRAN ATTACKED: EXPERT - KUNA / HELLENIC SHIPPING
Prices of oil will not drop below level of $100 per barrel and may jump to $150 pb in the coming two months, according to the prominent Kuwaiti expe ...
Wednesday, 04 April 12
CHURCHILL MINING TO ACCELERATE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AGAINST INDONESIA
Churchill Mining plc (AIM: CHL), advises that notations on the Indonesian Supreme Court's register of cases shows the Supreme Court has rejected th ...
|
|
|
Showing 4776 to 4780 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Australian Coal Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
