We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 15 April 12
THE SPOT FIXTURE RATES FOR SUPRAMAX IN SE ASIA SAW SOME SOFTENING OF CHARTER RATES - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The market seem to be holding and except for Supramax and handy size index all other index was up with BDI up by 4.74 pct closing at ...
Friday, 13 April 12
MINERS OPPOSE GOVTS EXPORT TAX PLAN - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, Indonesian mining companies have strongly protested the government’s plan to impose a 25 percent export tax on ...
Friday, 13 April 12
S&P CAUTIONS AGAINST NEW INDONESIAN MINING REGULATIONS - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe reported that, Investors may have expressed concerns about looming new mining regulations, but ratings agency Standard & Poor& ...
Thursday, 12 April 12
FIRST QUARTER OF 2012 SAW AN ADDITIONAL 24.2 MILLION DWT OF DRY BULK CARRIERS ENTERING THE FLEET - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The inflow of newbuilt dry bulk vessels was larger than expected in the first quarter of 2012. As much as 24.2 million DWT were added to the fleet. ...
Wednesday, 11 April 12
TWO PERCENT OF IBP CONCESSION CONTAINS 42 MMT OF COAL
COALspot.com - 42.35 million ton of coal found in just 2% of PT Insani Bara Perkasa’s total concession area of 24,477 hectare.
Accord ...
|
|
|
Showing 4766 to 4770 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- The University of Queensland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
