We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 20 April 12
BUMA HAS PRODUCED 2.6 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN MARCH 2012
COALspot.com - BUMA has removed 28.0 million bcm (+6.4% YoY) of overburden in March 2012 while coal production was at 2.6 million tons (+1.3% YoY).
...
Thursday, 19 April 12
FRESH COAL SALES FROM JATENERGYS JONGKANG MINES
COALspot.com - Energy company Jatenergy Ltd (ASX code JAT) announced today that it had signed a contract for an 11,000 tonne coal sale due for shipm ...
Thursday, 19 April 12
HANDY - 'POSITIVE TREND', PANAMAX - 'A FIRMER TENDENCY', CAPESIZE - 'AGAIN NEGATIVE'
Handy
The positive trend from last week continued, with more cargoes entering the market. Skaw/Passero del fixed tick above USD 4000 for US Gulf di ...
Thursday, 19 April 12
WILLIS MARINE MARKET REVIEW FORECASTS ANOTHER DIFFICULT YEAR - WILLIS GLOBAL MARINE / HELLENIC SHIPPING
After an inauspicious start, 2012 could well be "another difficult and uncertain year for the maritime industry faced with the aftermath of the ...
Wednesday, 18 April 12
INDONESIA TO INTRODUCE EXPORT DUTY ON MINERAL ORES BY 6 MAY 2012
The Indonesian government is scheduled to issue regulation on export duty for minerals before May 6, 2012.
According to Bisnis Indonesia, as quot ...
|
|
|
Showing 4761 to 4765 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PTC India Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The University of Queensland
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
