We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 11 June 12
BAHANA FORECASTS THE COAL PRICES WILL FALL FURTHER
COALspot.com - Growing US coal supplies + low shipping costs = Asia as target.
According to Irwan Budiarto analyst at Bahana Securities, US ...
Monday, 11 June 12
ASIAN COAL TRADING COMMUNITY EMBRACES API 5 AND API 8
Press Release - The Asian coal trading community is embracing the API 5 and API 8 indexes for its swap contracts.
The API 5 index represents 5,50 ...
Sunday, 10 June 12
FREIGHT MARKET EXPECTED TO REMAIN WEAK FOR NEXT FEW WEEKS - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The BDI continued to fall this week and down by 2.99 pct closing at 877 points.
The Cape index also was down by 5.78 pct closing a ...
Friday, 08 June 12
ESSAR ENERGY RECEIVES FINAL APPROVAL FOR INDONESIAN COAL BLOCK
COALspot.com - Essar Energy plc, the India-focused integrated energy company, today announced that it has received final ‘Pinjam Pakai’ ...
Friday, 08 June 12
MINISTER DENIES COAL EXPORT TAX PLAN, ENDORSES RESTRICTIONS - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta post, one of the leading english news paper in Indonesia reported that, Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Jero Wacik has denied that ...
|
|
|
Showing 4696 to 4700 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Minerals Council of Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- The University of Queensland
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- White Energy Company Limited
|
| |
| |
|
