We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 22 June 12
COAL: THE BACKBONE OF MODERN ELECTRICITY - ECOAL
Coal has been described as the "forgotten fuel," perhaps because many aren't aware of the huge role it plays in powering the global econo ...
Thursday, 21 June 12
DRY BULK MARKET ON THE RISE AGAIN - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market was on the rise once again yesterday, with the Baltic Dry Index (BDI), the industry’s benchmark, rising by 18 points, or 1 ...
Wednesday, 20 June 12
BDI MOVING HIGHER, PANAMAX AND SUPRAMAX VESSELS STRONGER, CAPESIZE RATES NEAR TO HISTORICAL LOWS OF DECEMBER 2008 - MARIA BERTZELETOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry market seems to follow the dynamic of the previous week with the Baltic Dry Index showing daily increases since June 8th, but is still stand ...
Tuesday, 19 June 12
SMALLER DRY BULK CARRIERS LIFT UP MARKET, PANAMAXES SET TO FALL SAYS ANALYST - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Another rise for the dry bulk market was evident yesterday, as the industry’s benchmark, the BDI (Baltic Dry Index) was up for a ninth straigh ...
Sunday, 17 June 12
S7 & S8 ROUTES ARE LIKELY TO BE SOFT NEXT WEEK - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The BDI gained some increase after continues fall for several weeks.
The BDI increased by 47 points (up by 5.36 pct) closing at 92 ...
|
|
|
Showing 4686 to 4690 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PTC India Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
