We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 16 June 12
INDONESIAN SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL & CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL CONTRACT SWAPS ARE UNDER PRESSURE
COALspot.com - Indonesian sub-bituminous coal swaps and CFR South China coal contracts for July deliveries seems to be under pressure this week.&nbs ...
Friday, 15 June 12
CAPESIZE - THE LEVELS THAT DID FIX ARE DOWN W-O-W LEVELS - FEARNLEYS
Handy
Another slow-moving market with rates hovering at same level as last week. US Gulf positions fixed USD 25,000 for trips to Cont/Passero and S ...
Thursday, 14 June 12
SMALLER DRY BULK CARRIERS LIKELY TO FACE MORE CHALLENGES; DEMOLITION ACTIVITY SET FOR RECORD YEAR - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
In its latest update on the dry bulk markets, BIMCO said that China is partly “failing to deliver” on raw material imports that can affe ...
Wednesday, 13 June 12
LOW COAL PRICES COULD CHANGE SUPPLY SIDE DYNAMICS - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings believes that the weakness seen in thermal coal prices in recent months should reverse once demand from major importers recovers, alth ...
Tuesday, 12 June 12
ITACHA RESOURCES BUYS SARANA MARINE - INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, coal mining company PT Itacha Resources, a joint venture between Anthoni Salim and Glenn Yusuf, announced that Itacha ...
|
|
|
Showing 4691 to 4695 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
