We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 13 October 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Following up on our insight on May 2021, where we discussed about the Capesize market outlook for the second half of the year, we are pleased to se ...
Wednesday, 13 October 21
FBX INDEX: THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF SHORT-TERM FORECASTING - LARS JENSEN
Will freight rates on Asia-Europe or the Transpacific reach 40.000 USD/FFE in the run-up prior to Chinese New Year 2022? Or will they start droppin ...
Wednesday, 13 October 21
CHINA FLOODS: COAL PRICE HITS FRESH HIGH AS MINES SHUT - BBC
The price of coal used in China’s power plants has surged to a new record high as another of the country’s key mining regions is hit by ...
Tuesday, 12 October 21
BUMA SIGNS CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT FOR AUSTRALIAN ASSET ACQUISITION
PT Tbk. announced that its subsidiary, PT Bukit Makmur Mandiri Utama, through its newly incorporated Australian subsidiary, BUMA International Pty ...
Tuesday, 12 October 21
INDONESIA'S COAL-BASED POWER PLANTS ARE SUBJECT TO CARBON TAX NEXT YEAR, ELECTRICITY COSTS COULD RISE! - CNBC
The Indonesian government is planning plans to implement a carbon tax of IDR 30 per kilogram (kg) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) or equivalent ...
|
|
|
Showing 461 to 465 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
