We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 29 October 12
US COAL EXPORTS ARE EXPECTED TO REACH 125 MILLION TONS THIS YEAR - EIA
COALspot.com - US coal exports are expected to reach 125 million tons this year, surpassing the old record of about 113 million tons set in 1981, sa ...
Sunday, 28 October 12
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAPS (FOB ) FOR DECEMBER 2012 DELIVERY STAYED FLAT D-D
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for December 2012 delivery flat on D-D but gained 0.38 percent on W-W on Friday, 26 October 2012, ...
Sunday, 28 October 12
INDONESIA TO INDIA SUPRAMAX FREIGHT MARKET FAIRLY STEADY - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The Cape size sector continued to remain active with iron ore movement being steady. All other sectors were down.
The BDI was up b ...
Friday, 26 October 12
SHIPPING MARKETS HEADING FOR DIVISION AND MULTI-TIER WILL BECOME THE NORM - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
It seems that something is expected to be fundamentally different in the way that the shipping markets will be operating in the future, according to ...
Friday, 26 October 12
DRY BULK MARKET FALLS ON WORRIES THAT RECENT RALLY WILL BE SHORTLIVED - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market retreated yesterday as a result of a plunge of the Capesize dry bulk carriers' segment, after their latest rally. As a result, ...
|
|
|
Showing 4526 to 4530 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The University of Queensland
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
