We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 01 November 12
KOMIPO LOOKING FOR 440,000 MT OF 4600 KCAL/KG NAR COAL FOR BORYEONG POWER PLANT
COALspot.com - Korea Midland Power Co. Ltd.(KOMIPO) is inviting bids from coal producers, marketing companies or traders to supply of 440,000 Metric ...
Thursday, 01 November 12
CAPESIZE RATES FALL, DRY BULK MARKET RETREATS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
It was another lackluster session yesterday in the dry bulk markets, with the industry's benchmark, the BDI (Baltic Dry Index) retreating by 1.63 p ...
Thursday, 01 November 12
HANDY : WCI-CHINA RATES ARE AT AROUND USD 5,000 AND ECI-CHINA AROUND USD 4000 - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The Atlantic market remains quiet due to a lack of cargoes and an increased supply of ships. Rates from the Continent to east Med were around ...
Tuesday, 30 October 12
COAL PRODUCTION TO RISE BY FIVE PERCENT IN 2013 - TEMPO INTERACTIVE
TEMPO Interactive reported that, Indonesian Coal Mining Association (APBI) chairman Bob Kamandanu has estimated that Indonesian coal production will ...
Tuesday, 30 October 12
NEW BUILDING ORDERING ACTIVITY KEEPS ON RETREATING - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Ship owners have refrained from placing any new orders of vessels during the course of the past few days, according to shipbroker reports. According ...
|
|
|
Showing 4521 to 4525 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- MS Steel International - UAE
- White Energy Company Limited
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
