We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 15 October 12
IT'S STRICTLY COME CHARTERING - CLARKSON RESEARCH SERVICES
The charter market is a bit of a dance between ship owner and charterer: one leader, one follower; one step, two steps, turn... The dance is symbiot ...
Sunday, 14 October 12
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL AND CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAPS: SOFT
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for December 2012 delivery lost 0.329 percent w- w but gained 0.248 percent d-d on Friday, 12 Oct ...
Sunday, 14 October 12
SUPRAMAX FREIGHT STEADY: PANAMAX FREIGHTS FIRM - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The shipping market saw some hectic activity in the Cape and panamax sector and quite a lot of fixtures reported.
The BDI was up b ...
Friday, 12 October 12
HOW REAL IS THE THREAT OF PIRACY? - BIMCO
The threat of modern piracy remains serious, regardless of its seasonal variations and the fact that it is chiefly confined to the Indian Ocean, Gul ...
Friday, 12 October 12
INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES OCCUR IN THE SECOND HAND VESSEL MARKETS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Although 2012 has by now evolved into one of the most challenging years for global shipping industry, ship owners are scouting the second hand ship ...
|
|
|
Showing 4536 to 4540 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
